Comments on: Session proposal: Theory by the numbers http://theory2012.thatcamp.org/10/12/session-proposal-theory-by-the-numbers/ The Humanities and Technology Camp Wed, 25 Sep 2013 05:32:20 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.12 By: Patrick http://theory2012.thatcamp.org/10/12/session-proposal-theory-by-the-numbers/#comment-307 Sat, 13 Oct 2012 00:55:00 +0000 http://theory2012.thatcamp.org/?p=322#comment-307 Don’t want to detract attention from the core idea that we don’t treat archives as objects of study themselves, but I’ve done some example playing with NVS Challenge data at BillCritOMatic if interested

]]> By: Andrew Goldstone http://theory2012.thatcamp.org/10/12/session-proposal-theory-by-the-numbers/#comment-304 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:47:00 +0000 http://theory2012.thatcamp.org/?p=322#comment-304 Awesome idea about the MLA Variorum data–the bibliography for the Comedy of Errors is in its own xml file in the “NVS Challenge” repository–let’s play with this!

]]> By: Andrew Goldstone http://theory2012.thatcamp.org/10/12/session-proposal-theory-by-the-numbers/#comment-305 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:47:00 +0000 http://theory2012.thatcamp.org/?p=322#comment-305 re exposing dataset–sigh. cf. remark about “closed access.”

]]> By: Andrew Goldstone http://theory2012.thatcamp.org/10/12/session-proposal-theory-by-the-numbers/#comment-303 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:41:00 +0000 http://theory2012.thatcamp.org/?p=322#comment-303 Also: quantified evaluation of scholarly “impact”–an already existing “theory”?

]]> By: Patrick http://theory2012.thatcamp.org/10/12/session-proposal-theory-by-the-numbers/#comment-302 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:18:00 +0000 http://theory2012.thatcamp.org/?p=322#comment-302 Ooh! I like this! Another possible dataset might be the TEI from MLA’s Variorum editions. Looks like they provide the TEI, and bibliographies are (kinda) easily extracted to manipulate. (Not sure if that’s just a subset of what you already have).

I’m extra curious about how you have manipulated/exposed the datasets you have!

]]>